Philosophy Written Assignment

Philosophy Written Assignment

In his 1974 book, Anarchy, State and Utopia, Robert Nozick raises the following thought experiment:

“Suppose there were an experience machine that would give you any experience you desired.  Superduper neuropsychologists could stimulate your brain so that you would think and feel you were writing a great novel, or making a friend, or reading an interesting book.  All the time you would be floating in a tank, with electrodes attached to your brain.  Should you plug into this machine for life, preprogramming your life’s experiences?  If you are worried about missing out on desirable experiences, we can suppose that business enterprises have researched thoroughly the lives of many others.  You can pick and choose from their large library or smorgasbord of such experiences, selecting your life’s experiences for, say, the next two years.  After two years have passed, you will have ten minutes or ten hours out of the tank, to select the experiences for your next two years.   Of course, while in the tank you won’t know that you’re there; you’ll think it’s all actually happening.  Others can also plug in to have the experiences they want, so there’s no need to stay unplugged to serve them.  (Ignore problems such as who will service the machines if everyone plugs in.)  Would you plug in?  What else can matter to us, other than how our lives feel from the inside?”  

Philosopher Shelly Kagan does a nice job of discussing the thought experiment in the following video  (The thought experiment discussion begins about 1 minute in.): https://youtu.be/OqIgQC0Gx4Y

Compose an essay of no more than 1500 words on ONE of the following topics:

(Option A) Consider Robert Nozick’s thought experiment of the experience machine. Compose an essay in which you address the question of whether it matters that you spend your entire life in the machine. To answer this question, consider a life that you consider worth living. Does it matter whether things actually happen? Or is it sufficient to merely have the experience.  

Be sure to focus your essay around the reasons you give in favor of your position (your thesis can even be a blend of yes and no, if you like). State whether your argument is inductive or deductive, and say why. Finally, consider at least one objection to your view, and respond to it. (NB1: You may wish to discuss the conditions under which you would use the machine, and use the appropriate argument forms, if necessary.)  (NB2: Importantly, this is NOT an essay about Hedonism.  The issue here is not whether Hedonism is true or false, or what scholars think about this thought experiment.  The central issue of the assignment is: WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT IT?  WHAT REASONS WOULD YOU GIVE FOR OR AGAINST A LIFE IN THE MACHINE?)

White paper for an external audience

(Option B) Robert Nozick argues that he would not sign up to use an experience machine for life.   While this possibility is remote for us, it could be argued that we have many technologies which function as local experience machines.  Compose an essay or dialogue (approximately 1500 words) in which you address the following issue:

Consider a type of technology that you currently use, and address to what extent this technology is analogous to the experience machine in Robert Nozick’s essay.  Be sure to focus on features that are similar as well as different.  Next, address whether you agree with Nozick’s position by considering whether his argument provides reasons why you yourself might wish to limit the amount of time you spend using your chosen technology.  (For example, if you agree with Nozick, does this mean that you should give up your Netflix account?)  Be sure to clearly state your own reasons.  Finally, consider an objection that someone might raise against your viewpoint, and respond to the objection.

Important points to keep in mind:

I recommend you begin as soon as possible, and work in short bursts every day. (For example, work in 5-20 minute blocks, and aim for 200 words per day.

If you wish, you may compose your essay in the form of a letter, dialogue, or narrative form.  (If you choose this option, please discuss your essay with me as you develop it.   Dialogues can sometimes be challenging to construct.  Remember: your narrative is a vehicle for your argument.)

Late assignments will be penalized one letter grade for every day they are late, unless arrangements are made with me in advance.

Essays are to be typed, using standard fonts and margins (e.g. 12 point font, 1 inch margins) Remember: concision is a virtue!

The citation format is your choice.  Just keep it consistent. 

It is fine if you discuss this essay with others.  However, all work should be a product of your own effort.   Academic Dishonesty will be penalized with a grade of 0 (worse than an F) on this assignment, and a report will be sent to Student Affairs explaining the circumstances of the dishonesty.  

Your essays will be graded according to the rubric below.  You are also welcome to send me a draft of your essay.

Finally, if anyone is willing to be really brave, I can put together a feedback video using your draft.  E-mail me if you would like to volunteer. 

Rubric for Writing Assignments

Rubric for Writing Assignments
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThesis	40.0 pts Excellent essay controlled by clear, precise, well-defined thesis; is sophisticated in both statement and insight 32.0 pts Good clear, specific, arguable thesis central to the essay; may have left minor terms undefined 28.0 pts Passing general thesis or controlling idea; may not define several central terms 24.0 pts Non-passing thesis vague or not central to argument; central terms not defined	40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConceptual/Accuracy/Argumentation	40.0 pts Excellent Ideas and course content are accurately stated; student explains views in their own words; logical connections are sophisticated, correct and evident throughout 32.0 pts Good shows a good understanding of the texts, ideas and methods of the assignment; goes beyond the obvious; may have one minor factual or conceptual inconsistency 28.0 pts Passing shows an understanding of the basic ideas and information involved in the assignment; may have some factual, interpretive, or conceptual errors 24.0 pts Non-passing shows inadequate command of course materials or has significant factual and conceptual errors; confuses some significant ideas	40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelopment and Support	40.0 pts Excellent well-chosen examples; uses persuasive reasoning to develop thesis consistently; uses specific quotations or sources effectively; logical connections between ideas are evident 32.0 pts Good pursues explanation and proof of thesis consistently; develops a main argument with explicit major points with appropriate textual evidence and supporting detail 28.0 pts Passing only partially develops the argument; shallow analysis; some ideas left unsupported; fails to integrate quotations appropriately; warrants missing 24.0 pts Non-passing frequently only narrates; digresses from one topic to another without developing ideas or terms; makes insufficient or awkward use of textual evidence	40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStructure	40.0 pts Excellent well-constructed paragraphs; appropriate, clear and smooth transitions; arrangement of organizational elements seems particularly ap 32.0 pts Good distinct units of thought in paragraphs controlled by specific, detailed, and arguable topic sentences; clear transitions between developed, cohering, and logically arranged paragraphs 28.0 pts Passing some awkward transitions; some brief, weakly unified or undeveloped paragraphs; arrangement may not appear entirely natural; contains extraneous information 24.0 pts Non-passing simplistic, tends to narrate or merely summarize; wanders from one topic to another; illogical arrangement of ideas	40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLanguage	40.0 pts Excellent uses sophisticated sentences effectively; usually chooses words aptly; observes professional conventions of written English; makes few minor or technical errors 32.0 pts Good a few mechanical difficulties or stylistic problems; may make occasional problematic word choices or syntax errors; a few spelling or punctuation errors; usually presents quotations effectively, using appropriate format 28.0 pts Passing more frequent wordiness; unclear or awkward sentences; imprecise use of words or over-reliance on passive voice; some distracting grammatical errors (wrong verb tense, pronoun agreement, apostrophe errors, singular/plural errors, article use, preposition use, comma splice, etc); attempts to present quotations accurately 24.0 pts Non-passing some major grammatical or proofreading errors (subject-verb agreement, sentence fragments, word form errors, etc.); language frequently weakened by cliches, colloquialisms, repeated inexact word choices; incorrect quotation or citation format	40.0 pts