Rubric: Assignment #1 – Threat Management
Student’s Name: _______________________ Title: ______________________________ Overall Grade: _____________
| A | B | C | D | F | |
| Content: Summary & Description | Essay clearly and thoroughly answers the questions posed. Information is presented clearly and is very easy to understand. Essay is very well-organized and easy to follow. | Essay adequately answers the questions posed. Information is presented clearly. Essay is well-organized and easy to follow. | Essay answers some but not all of the questions posed. Some of the information presented is confusing or difficult to understand. Essay is somewhat difficult to follow. | Essay evades the questions. Information is confusing or difficult to understand. Essay is difficult to follow. | Essay fails to answer the questions. Information is very confusing or very difficult to understand. Essay is very difficult to follow. |
| Content: Paths to Intended Violence | Each stage to the Pathway to Violence is very clearly defined and contain correct examples. | Most stages to the Pathway to Violence are clearly defined and contain correct examples. | Some stages to the Pathway to Violence are clearly defined and some correct examples are included. | Stages and examples to explain the Pathway to Violence are lacking or poorly explained. | Stages and examples to explain the Pathway to Violence are inaccurate or very poorly explained. |
| Analysis: Crime Prevention Strategies | Crime prevention strategies are excellent and very well-explained. Link between theory and examples is clearly evident. | Crime prevention strategies are good and well-explained. Link between theory and examples is evident. | Crime prevention strategies are satisfactory. Link between theory and examples is somewhat evident. | Crime prevention strategies are poorly explained. Link between theory and examples is lacking. | Crime prevention strategies are not satisfactory or realistic. Link between theory and examples is not evident. |
| Level of Research | Excellent level of research conducted. Peer-reviewed sources cited beyond the required minimum amount. | Great level of research conducted. Peer-reviewed sources cited met the required minimum amount. | Satisfactory level of research conducted. Peer-reviewed sources cited met the required minimum amount. | Unsatisfactory level of research conducted. Peer-reviewed sources cited less than the required minimum amount. | Poor level of research conducted. Little or no Peer-reviewed sources cited. |
| Detail and Understanding | Understanding of the case and research into the case is clearly evident. All relevant information is included. Level of detail is excellent. | Understanding of the case and research into the case is evident. Most relevant information is included. Level of detail is good. | Understanding of the case and research into the case is somewhat evident. Some relevant information is missing. Level of detail is satisfactory. | Evidence of understanding of the case and research into the case is limited. Substantial relevant information is missing. Level of detail is not satisfactory. | Understanding of the case and research into the case is not apparent. Significant relevant information is missing, and inaccurate information is presented. Level of detail is insufficient |
| Writing Style | All grammar, spelling, and syntax are correct. Extensive reference list is provided. Writing is highly original. | Most grammar, spelling, and syntax are correct. Appropriate reference list is provided. Writing is original. | Some grammar, spelling, or syntax errors are evident. Some errors are made in referencing. Overuse of references and quotations. | Careless editing. There are many errors of grammar, spelling or syntax. No references or incorrect references are offered. Some information is plagiarized. | Excessive errors of grammar, spelling and syntax. No references or incorrect references are offered. Information is plagiarized. |
- List two-three factors that influence semantic development. For each, specify how a specific factor might affect a childs semantic development.
- Walden University PRAC 6635 WEEK 2 Practicum Experience Plan (PEP)-Step-By-Step Guide
- C717 Task 1 TechFite Corporate Policies
- C717 Task 2 Ethical Dilemma Analysis and Perspectives
- (no title)
Do you find yourself approaching a tight assignment deadline? We have a simple solution for you! Just complete our order form, providing your specific instructions. Rest assured that our team consists of professional writers who excel in their respective fields of study. They utilize extensive databases, top-notch online libraries, and up-to-date periodicals and journals to ensure the delivery of papers of the utmost quality, tailored to your requirements. Trust us when we say that thorough research is conducted for every essay, and our expertise in various topics is unparalleled. Furthermore, we have a diverse team of writers to cover a wide range of disciplines. Be assured that all our papers are created from scratch, guaranteeing originality and uniqueness.
Write my essays. We write papers from scratch and within your selected deadline. Just give clear instructions and your work is done
Deadline Approaching? Get Fast, Reliable Help with Your Essay Now!
Simply post your question and get it answered by a professional tutor. It's as simple as that!
Write My Essay For Me