Required Readings McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.\r\n• Chapter 9, “Systems Development Life Cycle: Nursing Informatics and Organizational Decision Making” (pp. 175–187)\r\n• Chapter 12, “Electronic Security” (pp. 229–242)\r\n• Chapter 13, “Workflow and Beyond Meaningful Use” (pp. 245–261)\r\nAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.a). Health IT evaluation toolkit and evaluation measures quick reference guide. Retrieved September 27, 2018, from\r\nhttps://healthit.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/evaluation-res ources/health-it-evaluation-toolkit-and-evaluation-measures-quick-reference\r\nAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.b). Workflow assessment for health IT toolkit. Retrieved September 27, 2018, from https://healthit.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/evaluation-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit\r\n\r\nRequired Media\r\nLouis, I. (2011, August 17). Systems development life cycle (SDLC) [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtpyjPrpyX8\r\nDiscussion: The Inclusion of Nurses in the Systems Development Life Cycle\r\nIn the media introduction to this module, it was suggested that you as a nurse have an important role in the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC). With a focus on patient care and outcomes, nurses may not always see themselves as contributors to the development of new systems. However, as you may have observed in your own experience, exclusion of nurse contributions when implementing systems can have dire consequences.\r\nIn this Discussion, you will consider the role you might play in systems development and the ramifications of not being an active participant in systems development.\r\nTo Prepare:\r\n• Review the steps of the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) as presented in the Resources.\r\n• Reflect on your own healthcare organization and consider any steps your healthcare organization goes through when purchasing and implementing a new health information technology system.\r\n• Consider what a nurse might contribute to decisions made at each stage of the SDLC when planning for new health information technology.\r\nBy Day 3 of Week 9\r\nPost a description of what you believe to be the consequences of a healthcare organization not involving nurses in each stage of the SDLC when purchasing and implementing a new health information technology system. Provide specific examples of potential issues at each stage of the SDLC and explain how the inclusion of nurses may help address these issues. Then, explain whether you had any input in the selection and planning of new health information technology systems in your nursing practice or healthcare organization and explain potential impacts of being included or not in the decision-making process. Be specific and provide examples.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n \r\n• Grid View\r\n• List View\r\n Excellent Good Fair Poor\r\nMain Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)\r\nAnswers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.\r\n \r\nSupported by at least three current, credible sources.\r\n \r\nWritten clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)\r\nResponds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.\r\n \r\nAt least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.\r\n \r\nSupported by at least three credible sources.\r\n \r\nWritten clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)\r\nResponds to some of the discussion question(s).\r\n \r\nOne or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.\r\n \r\nIs somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.\r\n \r\nSomewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.\r\n \r\nPost is cited with two credible sources.\r\n \r\nWritten somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.\r\n \r\nContains some APA formatting errors. 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)\r\nDoes not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.\r\n \r\nLacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.\r\n \r\nLacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.\r\n \r\nDoes not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.\r\n \r\nContains only one or no credible sources.\r\n \r\nNot written clearly or concisely.\r\n \r\nContains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.\r\n \r\nDoes not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.\r\nMain Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)\r\nPosts main post by day 3. 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)\r\nDoes not post by day 3.\r\nFirst Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)\r\nResponse exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.\r\n \r\nResponds fully to questions posed by faculty.\r\n \r\nProvides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.\r\n \r\nDemonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.\r\n \r\nCommunication is professional and respectful to colleagues.\r\n \r\nResponses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.\r\n \r\nResponse is effectively written in standard, edited English. 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)\r\nResponse exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.\r\n \r\nCommunication is professional and respectful to colleagues.\r\n \r\nResponses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.\r\n \r\nProvides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.\r\n \r\nResponse is effectively written in standard, edited English. 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)\r\nResponse is on topic and may have some depth.\r\n \r\nResponses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.\r\n \r\nResponses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.\r\n \r\nResponse may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)\r\nResponse may not be on topic and lacks depth.\r\n \r\nResponses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.\r\n \r\nResponses to faculty questions are missing.\r\n \r\nNo credible sources are cited.\r\nSecond Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)\r\nResponse exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.\r\n \r\nResponds fully to questions posed by faculty.\r\n \r\nProvides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.\r\n \r\nDemonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.\r\n \r\nCommunication is professional and respectful to colleagues.\r\n \r\nResponses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.\r\n \r\nResponse is effectively written in standard, edited English. 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)\r\nResponse exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.\r\n \r\nCommunication is professional and respectful to colleagues.\r\n \r\nResponses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.\r\n \r\nProvides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.\r\n \r\nResponse is effectively written in standard, edited English. 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)\r\nResponse is on topic and may have some depth.\r\n \r\nResponses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.\r\n \r\nResponses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.\r\n \r\nResponse may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)\r\nResponse may not be on topic and lacks depth.\r\n \r\nResponses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.\r\n \r\nResponses to faculty questions are missing.\r\n \r\nNo credible sources are cited.\r\nParticipation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)\r\nMeets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)\r\nDoes not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.\r\nTotal Points: 100\r\n\r\n
Do you find yourself approaching a tight assignment deadline? We have a simple solution for you! Just complete our order form, providing your specific instructions. Rest assured that our team consists of professional writers who excel in their respective fields of study. They utilize extensive databases, top-notch online libraries, and up-to-date periodicals and journals to ensure the delivery of papers of the utmost quality, tailored to your requirements. Trust us when we say that thorough research is conducted for every essay, and our expertise in various topics is unparalleled. Furthermore, we have a diverse team of writers to cover a wide range of disciplines. Be assured that all our papers are created from scratch, guaranteeing originality and uniqueness.
Write my essays. We write papers from scratch and within your selected deadline. Just give clear instructions and your work is done
Need Help Writing an Essay?
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.
Write My Essay For Me